~mattel-v-mga-entertainment
Did MGA expressly allege that Machado and/or Brawer brought market intelligence group information to MGA from Mattel?
Did MGA's counterclaim-in-reply for misappropriation of trade secrets under California law qualify as compulsory?
Did the district court abuse its discretion in awarding MGA fees?
Did the district court abuse its discretion in awarding fees and costs under the Copyright Act?
How did MGA contribute to the state of the law in the field of copyright?
How did the district judge review the unredacted invoices?
Should Mattel have been provided with unredacted copies of MGA's legal invoices?
Was MGA's counterclaim-in-reply compulsory?
Were Mattel's arguments about apportionment and calculation convincing?
What action should the district court take on remand?
What argument does Mattel make against MGA being entitled to fees?
What claim did Mattel add to its complaint?
What claim did Mattel make against MGA Entertainment?
What claim did the jury reject?
What damages were awarded to MGA?
