What does appellee agree to do with the fund?
What is the debt claimed by both claimants?
What is appellee not colluding with either of the claimants about?
Were the appellant and the Platte Valley Bank under any obligations to each other regarding the disposition of the money credited to the bank?
Where was the judgment filed to become a lien on Moulton's property?
Did the telegram and letter of notification increase or affect the appellant's liability?
What are the conditions stated to be essential to the right to maintain interpleader?
What is the appellant's argument regarding the bill of interpleader?
Why is the relief being resisted?
What does appellee agree to pay the fund to?
What actions did the Platte Valley Bank take based on the telegram and letter?
Does the liability of the appellant to the Platte Valley Bank depend on whether the bank paid Halsey's order or not?
What is the basis of the contention against the existence of the second condition for interpleader?
What is the foundation of the claim for the entire fund?
What is claimed by the appellee and the Union Stock Yards Bank?